WowAce

                millings     azure     icy  azure/mill  icy/mill
Goldclover           784      1967     202      2.5089    0.2577
Deadnettle          1764      4406     461      2.4977    0.2613
Tiger Lily          4756     11913    1263      2.5048    0.2656
Fire Leaf            199       499      59      2.5075    0.2965
Adder's tongue     14676     44072    7840      3.0030    0.5342
Icethorn            2727      8252    1476      3.0260    0.5413
Lichbloom            484      1433     258      2.9607    0.5331

i gathered this from a very special forum :P

LS, the reason i dont use GW on my alts is cause they dont have professions, they only exist to post glyphs on AH, a plugin for Datastore would be awsome.

i run a glyph business and can asure u 100% that

Adder Tongue, Icethorn and Lichbloom gives 12/13 azure pigment per stack

Deadnettle, Tiger lily, Goldclover, Talandra Rose and fire leaf gives 8/9 azure Pigment per stack

as for icy pigment it can drop from 0 - 4 per stack, but normally from the first 3 herbs i mentioned u get 1 or 2 pigments per stack

These morning I mill more than 5k herbs xD sure can be better

But Icethorn Lichbloom and Deadneatle does it. Later with low herbs I get +- the same results with less quantity.

There are any addon that get these statistics?

LS, I think your API need more strong/debug function because currently any plugin can do a wrong call (without or with a bad parameter) and gets GW lua error without any mention about plugin.

To mill numbers with 4.01 I think all herbs have been normalized and can be simplified to:

10 herbs = 2 mills = 6 common pigments and 1 uncommon pigment = 3 inks (common) and 1 ink (uncommon) = 1 glyph (all needs 3 inks+1papyrus) and 1 ink uncommon.

getting same error like GeoRam2013, with r79

hi r79

2x GnomeWorks-79\Queue.lua:899: bad argument #1 to 'remove' (table expected, got nil) GnomeWorks-79\Queue.lua:899: in function `?' CallbackHandler-1.0-6 (Ace3):147: in function <...Ons\Ace3\CallbackHandler-1.0\CallbackHandler-1.0.lua:147> <string>:"safecall Dispatcher[6]":4: in function <[string "safecall Dispatcher[6]"]:4> <in C code>: ? <string>:"safecall Dispatcher[6]":13: in function `?' CallbackHandler-1.0-6 (Ace3):92: in function `Fire' AceEvent-3.0-3 (Ace3):120: in function <Ace3\AceEvent-3.0\AceEvent-3.0.lua:119>

-

Lusitan, Lilsparky : I coded my own approximation of Altoholic with a poor clone of Whitetooth makes to GW and BankItems.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NS7B4DEF

I don't have much code skills and it was only a "I can do it myself" if any one can do better please post it xD or if LS want integrate to GW do it ;)

I used Altoholic no only for items/skills and I assume its not a light addon, but other addons used to get information not only the tradeskill. The problem goes when GW can be setup as you want (columns/plugins,etc) but don't store these options on a restart.

If its not appropriated place to post the link I can delete...

Is it possible to make Gnomeworks get info from Datastore and its plugins.

Currently it shows diferent values:

for example my Datastore tooltip shows i have 6 Glyphs of Lightning bolt on my bank and gnomeworks only shows 3, and GW only updates to 6 when i open the bank tab that was the glyph.

i have a few alts that sell glyphs, with full access to the bank and Guild bank, but i dont need GW on them, and only use it on my Glyphs maker, so having GW fetch my data from datastore would help greattly maintaining stocks healthy and accurated

Been a while since i've tried this, two things.

1. There should be a cancel icon in the shopping queue so i don't need to right click delete.
2. When i use the click to search on auction house sometimes it shows the most expensive items first (if item has multiple pages it scans them all and stays on the last page which for me is most expensive)
3. Also it seems like the window layout itself takes up a lot of screen space, if i want to process the queue i need the window open which takes up almost the whole screen which doesn't seem very efficient.

Wooohooo!!! r76 actually told me what inks to buy and actually bought them from vendor when I clicked on them in the queue. HALLELUJAH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for your hard work!

*EDIT*

I just crafted 500 glyphs and Gnomeworks was flawless, even Skillet had issues with miscounting inks in the queue, but not today with GW!!!

Don't have time to read through the last 79 pages of comments and couldn't find the answer in the most recent few so I'll just throw this up here...

How does GnomeWorks track inventory counts? I am trying to use it as a way to manually queue glyphs based on current auctionator price + inventory count (I only craft glyphs @ 50g or higher and only select those I know will sell based on experience) but the inventory column does not list anything from my banker who holds all the currently crafted glyphs. I can see inventory counts for my scribe's bags/bank but no other alts are listed. I tried right clicking and setting filter to all the different options (alt, gbank, bank, bags, etc) to no avail.

This is a fresh install of r76. Related addons I am using are Bagnon, Altoholic, Auctionator and Auction Profit Master.

TL;DR: Alt inventory counts are not showing up.

Edit: Aaaand all of a sudden it's working. Didn't change a thing, a few relogs back and forth between characters and suddenly inventory counts are working. /shrug

the feature i requested in the ticked i linked earlier isn't exactly about "whole category", but about customized recipe-buttons. some sort of "craft all inks" or "craft all clothes" could be "programmed" into a button if such feature would exist into GW, like having an actionbar with macros, but only tradeskill related macros, customizable. example: "transmute cardinal ruby" - i do this everyday, but for that i need to manually search in the whole alchemy tradeskill list, find that recipe and click "create". i have to do this probably hundreds of time over the course of an expansion and it gets annoying having to do these several steps everyday, when it could have been doable with just 1 click on the "transmute - cardinal ruby" custom-made button, if such thing existed for GW. for inscription, "ink of the sea" item is by far the most crafted item in wotlk (and probably in cata the "new ink of the sea" will be the same) - and when you're milling hundreds of stacks of herbs it gets very annoying when you need to make them all into inks of the sea, having to manually search for "ink of the sea" and scrolling down the big list of insctiption to craft that item (because the tradeskill API lists not only the ink of the sea recipe, but all the recipe that use this item as a crafting reagent too, so the list is huge), where it could have been done with just 1 click, if a favorite bar with custom buttons would exist.

to some extent, same thing with glyphs, althought i don't use GW for inscription at all because it doesn't provide what i need (yet), but in order for GW to become the main tradeskill for wow of all the tradeskill addons out there it has to offer the features that the competition has and which GW lacks. one such feature would be that custom tradeskill-buttons (or favorite-tradeskills), which simplifies the process of crafting the same items every day so much and saves a lot of time.

with 300k gold made with inscription only after 4.0.1 until today, i must say that i wouldn't have been able to do this if i was to use GW, sadly. hence why i don't use it for inscription. but would LOVE to use this addon for all my toons and all professions and not having to disable it for certain tradeskills/chars. hence why i'm posting here and writing tickets aswell, to help make this addon the best of the best on the "market". there's a lot needed to be done for GW to be usable with inscription and enchanting (myself, i have to use other addons to handle these 2 professions), but so far, for the other professions it does the job quite decent (minus the fav-buttons).

i'm quite confident that, once the bugs get sorted out, more features will start to be added to GW, to make it competing with ZeroAuctions (for crafting glyphs) and with ScrollMaster (for enchanting).

Always converting pigments or entire full categories won't work: there are conflicts that arise. For example, Moonglow Ink and Ivory ink are both made of Alabaster Pigment and nothing else. Gem cuts share this problem to a profound degree. With bolts of cloth, there are both regular and imbued versions, not to even start in on the specialty cloths. Vellums aren't even a proper category anymore, just a single recipe. Queueing whole categories just makes no sense and can't possibly work in practice.

(It's also only reasonable to even talk about this for a very small subset of categories—a good indication that a general feature is the wrong approach.))

Also, you're still going to have to click process for each item in the queue. It's still going to take you a half dozen clicks to transmute all your gems either way.

However, LilSparky's idea of allowing you to pick out specific recipes and set a quota allows you to achieve the same goals without being a totally broken approach algorithmically. There aren't more than a dozen recipes or so for any character, so setting these up is a trivial one-time matter.