Plural forms of class names #4


  • New
  • Enhancment
Open
Assigned to ckknight
  • mundocani created this issue Feb 4, 2009

    What is the enhancement in mind? How should it look and feel?

    I'd like to request that plural forms of the class names be added to the library.  I have localizations available for many languages, but I need the placeholders to enter them.

    I suggest using the current convention adopted in LibBabble-Race, which for the English version would mean adding these to the base translation list:

        Warlocks = true,
        Warriors = true,
        Hunters = true,
        Mages = true,
        Priests = true,
        Druids = true,
        Paladins = true,
        Shaman_PL = true,
        Rogues = true,
        Deathknights = "Death Knights",

  • mundocani added the tags New Enhancment Feb 4, 2009
  • Phanx posted a comment May 3, 2009

    "Shamans" is a grammatically correct and perfectly acceptable plural form of "Shaman" that doesn't require semantic nonsense like "_PL". :p

  • mundocani posted a comment May 13, 2009

    Shaman_PL, Shamans, makes no difference to me, I'd just like the plurals to be available.


To post a comment, please login or register a new account.